Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PHILIP J ORTIZ WELDING MANUFACTURER

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PHILIP J ORTIZ WELDING MANUFACTURER in 144 RAILROAD AVENUE, HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NY 12533 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 340410869.

Watch Philip J Ortiz Welding Manufacturer — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Philip J Ortiz Welding Manufacturer is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
144 RAILROAD AVENUE
City
HOPEWELL JUNCTION
State
NY
ZIP
12533
Mailing
144 RAILROAD AVENUE, HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NY 12533
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees that drive the forklift trucks on site, the employer never implemented a training program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees that drive the forklift trucks on site, the employer never provided a refresher at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for welders, welding operations are conducted in an open area adjacent to the lunch room. The employer did not implement protection such as appropriate eye protection or welding screens.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees conducting repair work, to include welding and torching operations. Welders handle acetylene and oxygen gas tanks when in use. The employer stored these gas tanks near the exit door, that were not in use, without separating the oxygen cylinder from the acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don 3M 1/2 mask respirators when welding. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include fit tests, medical evaluations, and training.    b). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don a Gerson 1/2 mask respirator when torching. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include fit tests, medical evaluations, and training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don 3M 1/2 mask respirators when welding. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include medical evaluations.    b). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don a Gerson 1/2 mask respirator when torching. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don 3M 1/2 mask respirators when welding. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include fit tests.    b). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don a Gerson 1/2 mask respirator when torching. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don 3M 1/2 mask respirators when welding. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include training.    b). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don a Gerson 1/2 mask respirator when torching. The employer did not implement a written respirator program to include training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees required to don 3M 1/2/ mask respirators when welding. The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees that occasionally spray paint with Rust-Oleum. Rust-Oleum contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Aliphatic Hydrocarbon. The employer did not implement a hazard communication program to include a written program, training, and MSDS.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees that conduct welding tasks and occasionally spray paint with Rust-Oleum. Rust-Oleum contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Aliphatic Hydrocarbon. The employer did not implement a hazard communication program to include MSDS.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a). On or about 2/19/15, on site, for employees that conduct welding tasks and occasionally spray paint with Rust-Oleum. Rust-Oleum contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Aliphatic Hydrocarbon. The employer did not implement a hazard communication program to include training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340410869.