LUTZ, FL —
OSHA Inspection: MCOR AUTOMOTIVE, LLC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MCOR AUTOMOTIVE, LLC. in 21126 SR 54 SUITE 102, LUTZ, FL 33558 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 340416148.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MCOR AUTOMOTIVE, LLC.
- Site address
- 21126 SR 54 SUITE 102
- City
- LUTZ
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33558
- Mailing
- 21126 SR 54 SUITE 102, LUTZ, FL 33558
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811198
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Mill - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to, denatured alcohol, Rhino Hybrid Iso and Rhino Hybrid Resin Black. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Mill - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to, denatured alcohol, Rhino Hybrid Iso and Rhino Hybrid Resin Black. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. Spray area - the employer did not provide a written respiratory protection program when Allegro full face respirator and Allegro hood respirator were required. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. Spray area - the employer did not provide medical evaluations when Allegro full face respirator and Allegro hood respirator were required. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. Spray area - the employer did not provide fit testing when Allegro full face respirator was required. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 I05 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were constructed and situated so as to have a tag maintained at the compressor containing the most recent change date and the signature of the person authorized by the employer to perform the change: a. Spray enclosure - employees engaged in spraying operations that used an Allegro supplied air respirator system did not have a tag dated and signed by an authorized person that contained the most recent filter change date. Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811198)
VESTAL, NY—2026-06-18
MONROE INC.
TRACY, CA—2026-06-11
ALL PRO SMOG INC.
MINOA, NY—2026-06-10
STREET DREAMS CNY INC.
WESTLAKE, OH—2026-05-26
MAVIS TIRES SUPPLY LLC
SEFFNER, FL—2026-05-20
BENNETT'S AUTO REPAIR BY SCOTTY INC.
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-16
BRANNON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
SOUTHERN MILLING & LUMBER, INC.
OAKLAND PARK, FL—2026-07-16
PKB CABINETRY
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
ELIJAH WHOLESALE, LLC.
TAMPA, FL—2026-07-16
VALENCIA WHOLESALE, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340416148.