Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MCOR AUTOMOTIVE, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MCOR AUTOMOTIVE, LLC. in 21126 SR 54 SUITE 102, LUTZ, FL 33558 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 340416148.

Watch Mcor Automotive, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mcor Automotive, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
21126 SR 54 SUITE 102
City
LUTZ
State
FL
ZIP
33558
Mailing
21126 SR 54 SUITE 102, LUTZ, FL 33558
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811198
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Mill - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to, denatured alcohol, Rhino Hybrid Iso and Rhino Hybrid Resin Black.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Mill - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to, denatured alcohol, Rhino Hybrid Iso and Rhino Hybrid Resin Black.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. Spray area - the employer did not provide a written respiratory protection program when Allegro full face respirator and Allegro hood respirator were required.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. Spray area - the employer did not provide medical evaluations when Allegro full face respirator and Allegro hood respirator were required.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. Spray area - the employer did not provide fit testing when Allegro full face respirator was required.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 I05 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were constructed and situated so as to have a tag maintained at the compressor containing the most recent change date and the signature of the person authorized by the employer to perform the change:  a. Spray enclosure - employees engaged in spraying operations that used an Allegro supplied air respirator system did not have a tag dated and signed by an authorized person that contained the most recent filter change date.  Violation observed on or about 2/20/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340416148.