Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SOMERTON ANIMAL HOSPITAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SOMERTON ANIMAL HOSPITAL in 13400 PHILMONT AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19116 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 340422856.

Watch Somerton Animal Hospital — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Somerton Animal Hospital is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13400 PHILMONT AVENUE
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19116
Mailing
13400 PHILMONT AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19116
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541940
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.141 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): Enclosed workplace(s) were not so constructed, equipped, and maintained to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, or other vermin. A continuing and effective extermination program was not instituted:    a)  Somerton Animal Hospital, Garage Storage Records and Prescription Food Area:  The garage storage area where employees did laundry, retrieved records and prescription foods was not constructed, equipped and maintained to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects or other vermin.  A continuing and effective extermination program was not instituted to include removal of waste and pest management practices.  Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1096 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8210

29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:  a) Somerton Animal Hospital, Radiography Room - The employer did not survey the area in order to evaluate the radiation hazards related to employees' use of the Vet Tek 400 Xray which contains radioactive source to produce xray images of animals.  Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1096 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8210

29 CFR 1910.1096(i)(2): All individuals working in or frequenting any portion of radiation area(s) were not instructed in the applicable provisions of 29 CFR 1910.1096 for the protection of employees from exposure to radiation or radioactive materials:  a) Somerton Animal Hospital, Radiography Room - The employer did not instruct employees working in the radiography room in the applicable provisions of 29CFR1910.1096 for their protection from exposure to radiation or radioactive materials.  Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will  be met:    a)  Somerton Animal Hospital, site:  The employer did not develop, implement or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program for employees that used chemicals such as, but not limited to, chlorhexidine, contained in Dermachlor and Nolvasan, and sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate/sodium carbonate/tetrasodium pyrophosphate contained in Alconox.  Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  a) Somerton Animal Hospital - The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals such as, but not limited to, chlorhexidine contained in Nolvasan Solution.  Condition noted on February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a)  Somerton Animal Hospital - Safety data sheets for chemicals including but not limited to chlorhexidine contained in Nolvasan solution and Dermachlor Solutio, and sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate/sodium carbonate/tetrasodium pyrophosphate contained in Alconox were not available to employees .  Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)  Somerton Animal Hospital - Employees were handling chemicals without being trained in hazard communication and/or chemical safe work practices.  Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, chlorhexidine contained in Dermachlor Solution and Nolvasan Solution, and sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate/sodium carbonate/tetrasodium  pyrophosphate contained in Alconox. Observed on or about February 12, 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340422856.