Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BEST CHOICE PLUMBING

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BEST CHOICE PLUMBING in 6139 GRAYS AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19142 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 340437698.

Watch Best Choice Plumbing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Best Choice Plumbing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6139 GRAYS AVENUE
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19142
Mailing
2521 ORTHODOX STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19137
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.651 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c): Means of egress from trench excavations.  A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that are 4 feet (1.22 m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62 m) of lateral travel for employees.      a) Jobsite -  A safe means of egress was not provided for employees working inside a trench excavation that was approx. 8 feet deep exposing employees to collapse and other excavation hazards, on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.651 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees were working in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or excavations in which water was accumulating, and adequate precautions had not been taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation.    a) Jobsite - Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards associated with an excavation collapse due to the instability of the walls caused by water accumulation in the bottom of the excavation.  Observed on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.651 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(i)(3): Sidewalks, pavements, or appurtenant structures had been undermined and a support system or another method was not provided to protect employees from the possible collapse of such structures:    a) Jobsite - The employer allowed employees to work in an excavation that had been undermined beneath a sidewalk on both the East and West walls of the excavation.  This condition exposed the employees to struck-by hazards associated with trench collapses.  Observed on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary.    a) Jobsite -  Employees responsible for uncovering a pipe for plumbing operations were not protected from falling or rolling materials from the spoil pile which was situated approximately one (1) foot from the edge of the excavation.  Observed on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift:    a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that a competent person examined the excavation for hazardous conditions when employees were reasonably anticipated to work in the excavation.  Noted on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance paragraph (b) or (c) of 29 CFR 1926.652.    a) Jobsite - Employees working in a trench excavation, approximately 8 feet deep, were not protected from cave-ins.  The South wall of the excavation did not have any shoring or other adequate protective system in place.  Observed on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2300
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.652 C03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.652(c)(3)(iii): At least one copy of the tabulated data, which identifies the registered professional engineer who approved the data, was not maintained at the jobsite during construction of the protective system:      a) Jobsite - The employees working in and around the excavation were not protected from struck-by hazards associated with trench collapse when the aluminum hydraulic shoring was not placed according to the manufacturer's tabulated data.  The employer did not ensure that the employees had a copy of the tabulated data that would allow them to install the engineered system according to manufacturer's specifications.  Noted on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a) Jobsite - Employees were required to use Type N Masonry Cement without the guidance of a written hazard communication program.  Noted on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a) Jobsite - Employees were required to work with Type N Masonry cement without the benefit of training on the hazards of chemicals in the workplace.  Noted on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.54)    a) Jobsite - Employees were required to work with Type N Masonry cement with no SDS available to the employees on the jobsite.  Noted on or about 03 MAR 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340437698.