Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JUAN CARLOS PEREZ ESCOBAR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN CARLOS PEREZ ESCOBAR in 4125 CARRAMORE DR, CUMMING, GA 30040 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340454818.

Watch Juan Carlos Perez Escobar — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Carlos Perez Escobar is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4125 CARRAMORE DR
City
CUMMING
State
GA
ZIP
30040
Mailing
11 PICKLESIMON RD., WINDER, GA 30680
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.     On or about at 3/9/15 located at 4125 Carramore Dr., Cumming, GA:  Employees were observed installing roofing shingles on a house under construction while using a pneumatic nail gun without safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    On or about 3/9/2015 located at 4125 Carramore Dr., Cumming, GA: Employees were installing  roofing shingles on the roof of a house that was under construction working at the edge, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used by the empl9oyees while exposed to fall hazards of approximately up to 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340454818.