OSHA Inspection: PRAY TRUCKING INC.

Issued

2015-05-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2700.00 · Current $1080.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): The employer did not evaluate the competency of the operator who had previously received training appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered.      Location: Warehouse:    The employer did not ensure that previously-trained employees were competent in the safe operation of PITs and that the initial training was appropriate to the truck and working conditions here.

Issued

2015-05-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-05-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2700.00 · Current $1080.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): 29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition.    Location: Warehouse:        The Nissan 40 Optimum fork truck was being operated with a defective seat belt.

Issued

2015-05-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   Location: Garage: The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees exposed to chemicals such as gasoline, degreasing fluid, gear and motor oils and ethylene glycol.