OSHA Inspection: ZAC ANDERSON

Issued

2015-07-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On June 1, 2015, Zac Anderson dba Anderson Construction, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:      a.    Citation 1 Item 1, and b.    Citation 1 Item 2.

Issued

2015-07-17 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-08-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On February 25, 2015, , Rosen Construction, LLC was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:      a.    Citation 1 Item 3, and b.    Citation 1 Item 4

Issued

2015-06-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Zac Anderson dba Anderson Construction had employees exposed to struck-by hazards in the eyes from the use of pneumatic guns without eye protection, on a commercial construction site in Paris, Illinois.

Issued

2015-06-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork:  Zac Anderson dba Anderson Construction had employees exposed to 11 ft. fall hazards while working from a supported scaffold, which was lifted by a rough terrain forklift, on a commercial construction site in Paris, Illinois.  The employer did not secure the supported scaffold to the mast of the forklift by a chain or some other secure method.

Issued

2015-06-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:   Zac Anderson dba Anderson Construction had employees exposed to 11 ft. fall hazards without fall protection, while working from a supported scaffold which was lifted by a rough terrain forklift, on a commercial construction site in Paris, Illinois.

Issued

2015-06-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-05 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   Zac Anderson dba Anderson Construction had employees exposed to 11 ft. fall hazards without fall protection, on a commercial construction site in Paris, Illinois.