Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PHOENIX SOIL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PHOENIX SOIL, LLC in 58 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET, PLAINVILLE, CT 06062 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 340571710.

Watch Phoenix Soil, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phoenix Soil, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PHOENIX SOIL, LLC
Site address
58 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET
City
PLAINVILLE
State
CT
ZIP
06062
Mailing
58 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET, PLAINVILLE, CT 06062
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

23 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employers' written respiratory protection did not include worksite specific procedures  for respirator use and was not updated to reflect changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. Employees were required to wear a respirator while performing sandblasting operations involving crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Preprocessing- On, or about, April 20, 2015, an employee required to wear a North 7700-30M, half face, negative pressure respirator and an Allegro, Nova 3 supplied air respirator while performing sandblasting activities  was not medically evaluated prior to being required to use either respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Preprocessing  - On, or about, April 20, 2015, an employee required to wear a North 7700-30M, half face, negative pressure respirator while sandblasting crystalline silica had not been fit tested prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  Preprocessing  - On, or about, April 20, 2015, an employee required to wear a North 7700-30M, half face, negative pressure respirator while performing sandblasting activities involving crystalline silica had more than one days' growth of facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 I01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560S114

29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii): Breathing air did not meet requirements for Grade D breathing air as described in the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification G-7.1-1989:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employer did not ensure that breathing air used with a supplied air respirator was grade D breathing air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 I05 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that compressors used to supply breathing air to respirators were constructed and situated so as to have a tag maintained at the compressor containing the most recent change date and the signature of the person authorized by the employer to perform the change:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employer did not ensure that a tag was maintained at the compressor and contained the most recent change date and signature of the person authorized by the employer to perform the change.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.134 I07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both:  Preprocessing  - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the supplied breathing air source used while sandblasting the baghouse was not equipped with a high temperature alarm or a carbon monoxide alarm.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 K01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(v): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the procedures for respirator maintenance and storage:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained on proper respirator maintenance and storage procedures. A respirator was stored, unprotected and exposed to crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1800

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances S114

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  Preprocessing  - On, or about, April 20, 2015, an employee required to wear a North 7700-30M, half face, negative pressure respirator while sandblasting the upper portion of a disassembled baghouse, had not been trained to use the respirator prior to its use. The employee wore the respirator with facial hair that interfered with the seal of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, a portable fire extinguisher was sitting on the ground and not mounted for ready access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:   Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, an employee was not educated on basic principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards of incipient stage fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1440.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  Shop Area - On, or about, April 20, 2015, hoist chain used with a mobile, had not been inspected monthly, with a certification record that included the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identified of the chain inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1440

1910.179 J04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1440.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(4)(i): Crane(s) which were idle for a period of one month or more, but less than six months, were not given an inspection conforming with the requirements of 1910.179(j)(2) and 1910.179(m)(2) before being placed into service:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, a West Gantry Crane, used to move heavy equipment, such as a baghouse, had not been inspected prior to being put in service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1440

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employer failed to ensure that the following were legibly marked to indicate each purpose:  a) The breakers in the electrical panel near the preprocessing entrance were not marked to indicate each purpose.  b) The emergency disconnects located in the break room were not marked to indicate each purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  Lunch Room - On, or about, April 20, 2015, working space around the three phase emergency power for the overhead cranes in the preprocessing area was impeded by stored material including, but not limited to, power tools, paint and stored equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1440.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  Preprocessing - On, or about April 20, 2015, an electric lamp, used for illumination during sandblasting was missing its ground pin, eliminating continuity of path to ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1440

1910.305 A02 X

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(x): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from accidental damage, as might be caused, for example, by sharp corners, projections, and doorways or other pinch points:  Plant Lunch Room - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the flexible cord for the hand lamp, used for over head lighting was wrapped around the sharp corners of a metal, rectangular bracket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  Preprocessing - On, or about April 20, 2015, an orange extension cord, used to energized an electric lamp, used for illumination during sandblasting activities was not inspected prior to use and had a damaged outer protective jacket, exposing the inner conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service:  a) Preprocessing - On, or about April 20, 2015, an electric lamp, used for illumination during sandblasting  had a damaged outer protective jacket, exposing the inner conductors.  b) Plant Lunch Room - On, or about April 20, 2015, an electric lamp, used for illumination inside the lunchroom  had a damaged outer protective jacket, exposing the inner conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1080.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  Preprocessing - On, or about April 20, 2015, an unused opening in the cabinet that controlled facility lighting was not closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $540
  • — Z (S) $1080

1910.95 D03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(3): Repeat employee exposure monitoring was not performed whenever a change in production, process, equipment or controls increases noise exposure:  Facility - On, or about, April 30, 2015, the employer did not repeat employee exposure monitoring when there was a change in production and process associated with facility relocation that resulted in increased noise exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.95 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:  Facility - On, or about, April 30, 2015, the employer did not ensure that an employee that performed sandblasting activities and was exposed to noise at or above the 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels received training  on the hazards associated with noise and on the proper use of hearing protectors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  Preprocessing - On, or about, April 20, 2015, the employer failed to train an employee that performed sandblasting activities involving crystalline silica on the physical and health hazards of crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340571710.