Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WAMBLE ENTERPRISES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WAMBLE ENTERPRISES, LLC in 123 HEMLOCK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, MS 39702 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 340585124.

Watch Wamble Enterprises, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wamble Enterprises, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
123 HEMLOCK DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
MS
ZIP
39702
Mailing
1801 CHICKSAW DRIVE, COLUMBUS, MS 39705
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 employees exposed to tripping hazards while walking in the aisles near the bandsaw.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1200
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.107 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not at a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift.     (a) Paint Area - On or about April 22, 2015 flammable liquid storage exceeded the one day supply.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1200
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) Paint Area - On or about April 22, 2015 the employer did not provide a written respiratory protection program with procedures and elements for employees wearing tight fitting respirators while spray finishing using Sher-Kem High Gloss Metal Finishing Enamel.  The program needs to address: Medical evaluation, fit testing, and respirator maintenance.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1200
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): At this establishment, the employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated to operate the powered industrial truck as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.    (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 the forklift operators have not been certified by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): If at any time a powered industrial truck is found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition.   (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 powered industrial trucks were not taken out of service as required.      - Datsun forklift    - Clark forklift
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:   (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 powered industrial trucks were not taken out of service as required.      - Datsun forklift    - Clark forklift
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) Bandsaw - On or about April 22, 2015 employees operated a bandsaw with the blade guard not properly adjusted exposing the operator to the unguarded blade.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    (a) Paint Area - On or about April 22, 2015 flexible cords were spliced.     - Floor fan     - Exhaust fan
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $1200
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 employer did not provide an eye wash station.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (O) $0
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Shop - On or about April 22, 2015 the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to chemicals including, but not limited to, Sher-Kem High Gloss Finishing Enamel and Xylene.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (O) $0
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340585124.