Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUDSON VALLEY RENOVATIONS, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of HUDSON VALLEY RENOVATIONS, INC. in 30 LINCOLN AVE., PELHAM, NY 10803 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340594845.

Watch Hudson Valley Renovations, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hudson Valley Renovations, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30 LINCOLN AVE.
City
PELHAM
State
NY
ZIP
10803
Mailing
168 PRESSLER RD., WALLKILL, NY 12589
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $550.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The mobile scaffold platform was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $550
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The scaffold wheels did not rest on a firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The employees climbed on the scaffold frame for access to and from the work platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The mobile scaffold was 13' high and did not have guardrails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 W01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(1): The mobile scaffold was not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, to prevent racking or collapse of the scaffold and secure vertical members together laterally so as to automatically square and align the vertical members:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The mobile scaffold was missing cross bracing on the second level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:      On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) Employees who worked from a mobile scaffold were not provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The employees were framing out the side wall. They placed two aluminum extension ladders in an excavation on top of debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The employees were climbing ladders and attempting to carry 4x8 pieces of plywood. They were exposed to a 16' to 20' fall hazard
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:    On or about 4/29/2015, Lincoln Ave.    a) The employer did not provide ladder training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340594845.