PATASKALA, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JUAN CARLOS SOTELO LEO'N
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN CARLOS SOTELO LEO'N in 7210 HAZELTON ETNA S.W., PATASKALA, OH 43062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340598614.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JUAN CARLOS SOTELO LEO'N
- Site address
- 7210 HAZELTON ETNA S.W.
- City
- PATASKALA
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43062
- Mailing
- 1319 SMITH ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $329.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a. At the worksite where employees used air actuated nail guns to install the roof shingles, eye protection was not provided and required to be worn, thereby exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $329
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $256.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On the roof of the building where employees were installing shingles, the employees were not protected from falls by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, thereby being exposed to a 8 foot, 8 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $256
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340598614.