Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JUAN CARLOS SOTELO LEO'N

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN CARLOS SOTELO LEO'N in 7210 HAZELTON ETNA S.W., PATASKALA, OH 43062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340598614.

Watch Juan Carlos Sotelo Leo'N — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Carlos Sotelo Leo'N is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7210 HAZELTON ETNA S.W.
City
PATASKALA
State
OH
ZIP
43062
Mailing
1319 SMITH ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $329.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    a. At the worksite where employees used air actuated nail guns to install the roof shingles, eye protection was not provided and required to be worn, thereby exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $329
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $256.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On the roof of the building where employees were installing shingles, the employees were not protected from falls by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, thereby being exposed to a 8 foot, 8 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $256
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340598614.