Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHARLESGATE NORTH APARTMENTS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHARLESGATE NORTH APARTMENTS in 670 NORTH MAIN STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02904 (NAICS 624229). OSHA activity number 340606029.

Watch Charlesgate North Apartments — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Charlesgate North Apartments is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
670 NORTH MAIN STREET
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02904
Mailing
100 RANDALL ST, PROVIDENCE, RI 02904
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
624229
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    (a) Workplace:   On or about the week prior to 5-4-15, employees were permitted to perform testing to assure that electrical components to be worked on were de-energized,  and had not been provided with training required by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.333 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were de-energized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2):  (a) Workplace:  On or about the week prior to 5-4-15, the employer did not require employees working on parts of de-energized electric circuits to lock out and or tag out the circuits.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:  (a) Workplace:  On or about the week prior to 5-4-15, the employer did not provide employees testing 120 volt electrical equipment with adequate personal protective equipment for their hands.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    (a) Workplace:  On or about 5/4/15, the employer had not certified in writing that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    Abatement Note:   Once the PPE Hazard Assessment is completed you shall:        1) Certify that the hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132(d)(2),        2) Provide training to affected employees in proper use of required PPE 1910.132 (f)(1).      Guidance on conducting and documenting a PPE Hazard Assessment can be found on OSHA's website at:    http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/personalprotectiveequipment/
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:  (a) Workplace:  On or about 5/4/15, the employer did not maintain a written bloodborne pathogen exposure control plan that included maintenance staff.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340606029.