2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: LOAD TRAIL LLC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LOAD TRAIL LLC. in 220 FM 2216, SUMNER, TX 75486 (NAICS 336212). OSHA activity number 340609601.

Watch Load Trail LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Load Trail LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LOAD TRAIL LLC.
Site address
220 FM 2216
City
SUMNER
State
TX
ZIP
75486
Mailing
220 FM 2216, SUMNER, TX 75486
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336212
Employees
400
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4900.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a) In the Load Max area, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 4 feet while welding on the edge of a trailer;    (b) In the Load Trail Max finishing department, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 52 inches while working on a moving trailer attached to an overhead conveyor system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.107 H12

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4900.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(h)(12): Fire protection. All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, were not protected by an automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment:    (a) In powder coating booth number 1 located in the Load Trail Area, employees are exposed to fire hazards due to the lack of sprinklers or any other extinguishing means in the booth where combustible powder coating is performed;    (b) In powder coating booth number 2 located in the Load Trail Area, employees are exposed to fire hazards due to the lack of sprinklers or any other extinguishing means in the booth where combustible powder coating is performed;    (c) In powder coating booth number 1 located in the Load Max Area, employees are exposed to fire hazards due to the lack of sprinklers or any other extinguishing means in the booth where combustible powder coating is performed;    (d) In powder coating booth number 2 located in the Load Max Area, employees are exposed to fire hazards due to the lack of sprinklers or any other extinguishing means in the booth where combustible powder coating is performed;
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 C01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(vi): The written respiratory protection program did not contain procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators:    (a) For the written reparatory protection program, the employer did not develop procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for employees using supplied air respirators in the Load Trail area, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.134 I01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii): Breathing air did not meet requirements for Grade D breathing air as described in the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification G-7.1-1989:  (a) The employer does not ensure that compressed breathing air for the supplied air used in the powder coating booths in the Load Trail area meet at least the requirements for Grade D breathing air, exposing employees to inhalation hazards;  (b) The employer does not ensure that compressed breathing air for the supplied air used in the powder coating booths in the Load Max area meet at least the requirements for Grade D breathing air, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:    (a) Portable fire extinguishers in the paint kitchen are not checked or maintained, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6000.00 · Current $4500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding areas were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or by being required to wear appropriate goggles:    (a) Employees working in the Load Trail welding area were not protected from the ultraviolet radiation by welding screens or shields or by wearing appropriate goggles, exposing employees to eye injuries;    (b) Employees working in the Load Max welding area were not protected from the ultraviolet radiation by welding screens or shields or by wearing appropriate goggles, exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4500.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2):  Employees were exposed to airborne concentrations of particulates not otherwise regulated, listed in Table Z-1, which is also referenced in Table Z-3 under Inert or Nuisance dust, in excess of 15 mg/m3 (total fraction) as an 8-hour time weighted average:    (a)   In powder coating booth 2 in the Load Trail area, a powder coat applicator was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR), total fraction, at an 8-hour TWA of 122.4107 mg/m3 of air, approximately 8.2 times the PEL of 15 mg/m3;    (b) In the Load Max area, a powder coat applicator was exposed to PNOR, total fraction, at an 8-hour TWA of 30.0 mg/m3 of air, approximately 2.0 times the PEL of 15 mg/m3;    (c) In the Load Max area, a powder coat applicator was exposed to PNOR, total fraction, at an 8-hour TWA of 458.1 mg/m3 of air, approximately 30.5 times the PEL of 15 mg/m3;    (d) In the powder coating booth 2 in the Load Trail area, a powder coat applicator was exposed to PNOR, total fraction, at an 8-hour TWA of 173.6 mg/m3 of air, approximately 11.6 times the PEL of 15 mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0527

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of carbon black listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour-Time Weighted Average concentration of 3.5 mg/m3:  (a) In the powder coating booth 2 in the Load Max area, a powder coat applicator was exposed to carbon black at an 8-hour TWA of 29.2 mg/m3 of air, approximately 8.3 times the PEL of 3.5 mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 05279135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):    (a) The employer did not implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to achieve compliance with the prescribed exposure limit for particles not otherwise regulated, total fraction for powder coat applicators working in the Load Trail area;    (b) The employer did not implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to achieve compliance with the prescribed exposure limit for particles not otherwise regulated, total fraction for powder coat applicators working in the Load Max area;    (c)  The employer did not implement feasible administrative or engineering controls to achieve compliance with the prescribed exposure limit for carbon black for powder coat applicators working in the Load Max area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View LOAD TRAIL LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340609601.