Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JBK CONTRACTORS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JBK CONTRACTORS, LLC in 3201 WASHINGTON AVE., RACINE, WI 53405 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340630821.

Watch JBK Contractors, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JBK Contractors, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3201 WASHINGTON AVE.
City
RACINE
State
WI
ZIP
53405
Mailing
1620 13TH ST., RACINE, WI 53403
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  (a) The employer did not maintain a safety program that covered safety topics such as, but not limited to, electrical, struck-by, and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.    (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee was using head protection when working under personnel and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 C01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Guys, ties, and braces shall be installed according to the scaffold manufacturer's recommendations or at the closest horizontal member to the 4:1 height and be repeated vertically at locations of horizontal members every 20 feet (6.1 m) or less thereafter for scaffolds 3 feet (0.91 m) wide or less, and every 26 feet (7.9 m) or less thereafter for scaffolds greater than 3 feet (0.91 m) wide. The top guy, tie or brace of completed scaffolds shall be placed no further than the 4:1 height from the top. Such guys, ties and braces shall be installed at each end of the scaffold and at horizontal intervals not to exceed 30 feet (9.1 m) (measured from one end [not both] towards the other).  (a) The employer did not ensure that a scaffold was secured at the 4:1 height, exposing employees to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was used when working at and near the edge of the scaffold.    (b) The employer did not ensure that a mid rail was used below the crossing point of the cross braces behind where the employees were conducting work on the scaffold.    (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was installed at the working level's access/egress point of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340630821.