2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF GADSDEN, P.C.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF GADSDEN, P.C. in 900 GOODYEAR AVENUE, SUITE B, GADSDEN, AL 35903 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 340646488.

Watch Surgical Associates OF Gadsden, P.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Surgical Associates OF Gadsden, P.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
900 GOODYEAR AVENUE, SUITE B
City
GADSDEN
State
AL
ZIP
35903
Mailing
900 GOODYEAR AVENUE, SUITE B, GADSDEN, AL 35903
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  (a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not provide appropriate eye and face protection to employees exposed to chemical hazards when using chemicals such as, but not limited to, HLD Plus 28 Day 3% Glutaraldehyde (Cidex).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  (a) On or about September 24, 2013 - Facility, no written certification to verify the hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not provide appropriate eyewash facilities in the area where corrosive materials such as, but not limited to, Midmark General Purpose Ultrasonic Cleaning Solution, were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:   a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not develop and implement a written Bloodborne Pathogen program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:  a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not offer Hepatitis B vaccination to employees with occupational exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees using hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to HLD Plus 28 Day 3% Glutaraldehyde (Cidex).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:  a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDS) for hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to Midmark Ultrasonic Cleaning Solution and Midmark Speed-Clean.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about September 24, 2013 - Facility, employees, working in and around chemicals such as, but not limited to HLD Plus 28 Day 3% Glutaraldehyde (Cidex), were not provided effective information and training regarding the hazards associated with their use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340646488.