Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRESTIGE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRESTIGE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES in 1465 ROUTE 23 SOUTH, BUTLER, NJ 07405 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340679364.

Watch Prestige Construction Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Prestige Construction Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1465 ROUTE 23 SOUTH
City
BUTLER
State
NJ
ZIP
07405
Mailing
77 MILLTOWN ROAD, EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:      a) Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer failed to implement a written respiratory protection program for workers exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during mixing and pouring of products, including but not limited to, Lafarge Portland cement and i.pro VELVET masonry cement.                 Conditions observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer failed to provide a medical evaluation for the worker exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during mixing and pouring of products, including but not limited to, Lafarge Portland cement and i.pro VELVET masonry cement.                 Conditions observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:     a) Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer failed to provide fit testing for the employee exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece during mixing and pouring of concrete products, including but not limited to, Lafarge Portland cement and i.pro VELVET masonry cement.               Conditions observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:     a) Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer failed to train workers exposed to silica dust and required to wear N95 filtering face piece about the proper fit, usage and maintenance of respirators.                 Conditions observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     a)  Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who use chemicals, including but not limited, Lafarge Portland cement and i.pro VELVET masonry cement.    condition observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59:  The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    a)  Construction site at 1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    The employer did not provide training on the location and contents of the safety data sheet (SDS) to employees who are exposed to chemicals, including but not limited to, Lafarge Portland cement and i.pro VELVET masonry cement.    Conditions observed on or about 06/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2450.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces was between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces was not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces was between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform:     a)  1465 Route 23 South, Butler, NJ    Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet to the ground below when working on a tubular welded frame scaffold without midrails.     Condition observed on or about 6/04/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

View PRESTIGE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340679364.