WEST ELIZABETH, PA —
OSHA Inspection: SANYO CHEMICAL & RESINS, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SANYO CHEMICAL & RESINS, LLC in STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567, WEST ELIZABETH, PA 15088 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 340681170.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANYO CHEMICAL & RESINS, LLC
- Site address
- STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567
- City
- WEST ELIZABETH
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15088
- Mailing
- STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567, WEST ELIZABETH, PA 15088
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325211
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D02 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not include a block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram as part of process safety information concerning technology of the process. a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not maintain information concerning the technology of the process including a block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram as described in Appendix B to 29 CFR 1910.119.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.119 D02 I B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not include process chemistry as part of process safety information concerning technology of the process: a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not maintain information concerning the technology of the process including the process chemistry.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 D02 I D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(D): Safe upper and lower limits for such items as temperature, pressures, flows or compositions pertaining to the technology of the process were not compiled before conducting any process safety analysis required by this standard. a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not have written documentation stating the safe upper and lower limits including but not limited to the temperature and pressure of the reactor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process: a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) did not address the hazards of the process by fully evaluating scenarios where product streams relieved from the Aclube Reactor (R-203-1) through PSV 203-5A would be relieved to a dike area at ground level that contained electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.119 E03 V
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards related to facility siting: a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted by the employer did not address facility siting hazards such as, but not limited to potential employee exposure to flammable vapors released from the adjacent Aclube Process which could affect the occupants of the office building (trailer).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process: (a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not conduct a written MOC procedure for the addition of the second dilution tank pump, that increased batch time by approximately six hours.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $840
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325211)
FOREST PARK, GA—2026-07-16
POLYNT COMPOSITES USA INC.
PLAINFIELD, IL—2026-07-14
LOGOPLASTE USA INC.
WEST ELIZABETH, PA—2026-07-08
SYNTHOMER INC.
JACKSONVILLE, FL—2026-07-08
POLYNT COMPOSITES USA INC.
PROCTOR, WV—2026-07-06
COVESTRO LLC
More inspections in PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
JEFFERSON HILLS, PA—2026-07-16
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY ASPHALT TERMINAL
SMITHFIELD, PA—2026-07-16
CARLISLE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PITTSBURGH, PA—2026-07-15
DREAM GREENER LAWN & LANDSCAPE
COCHRANTON, PA—2026-07-15
CRAWFORD COUNTY HARDWOODS, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340681170.