Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SANYO CHEMICAL & RESINS, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SANYO CHEMICAL & RESINS, LLC in STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567, WEST ELIZABETH, PA 15088 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 340681170.

Watch Sanyo Chemical & Resins, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sanyo Chemical & Resins, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567
City
WEST ELIZABETH
State
PA
ZIP
15088
Mailing
STATE HIGHWAY 837 P.O. BOX 567, WEST ELIZABETH, PA 15088
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D02 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not include a block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram as part of process safety information concerning technology of the process.    a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not maintain information concerning the technology of the process including a block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram as described in Appendix B to 29 CFR 1910.119.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.119 D02 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not include process chemistry as part of process safety information concerning technology of the process:     a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not maintain information concerning the technology of the process including the process chemistry.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D02 I D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(D): Safe upper and lower limits for such items as temperature, pressures, flows or compositions pertaining to the technology of the process were not compiled before conducting any process safety analysis required by this standard.    a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not have written documentation stating the safe upper and lower limits including but not limited to the temperature and pressure of the reactor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards of the process:    a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer's process hazard analysis (PHA) did not address the hazards of the process by fully evaluating scenarios where product streams relieved from the Aclube Reactor (R-203-1) through PSV 203-5A would be relieved to a dike area at ground level that contained electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 E03 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards related to facility siting:   a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted by the employer did not address facility siting hazards such as, but not limited to potential employee exposure to flammable vapors released from the adjacent Aclube Process which could affect the occupants of the office building (trailer).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process:    (a) Aclube Process, on or about June 3, 2015 - The employer did not conduct a written MOC procedure for the addition of the second dilution tank pump, that increased batch time by approximately six hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340681170.