Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TOMAHAWK IRON & METAL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TOMAHAWK IRON & METAL, LLC in N10447 TANNERY ROAD, TOMAHAWK, WI 54487 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340691567.

Watch Tomahawk Iron & Metal, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tomahawk Iron & Metal, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
N10447 TANNERY ROAD
City
TOMAHAWK
State
WI
ZIP
54487
Mailing
N10447 TANNERY ROAD, TOMAHAWK, WI 54487
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) The employer failed to develop and implement a written respiratory protection program when respirators were required for torching and cutting operations.  Several key elements not addressed were designation of a program administrator, information was not provided to the health care provider, fit testing, ensure all required employees received medical clearances, training, and providing a copy of Appendix D to those that choose to wear respirators voluntarily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a)  The employer did not provide employees with medical evaluations where employees were wearing half mask respirators during torching operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:    (a) The employer did not ensure that each employee who wore a 3M half mask respirator was fit tested prior to initial use and at least annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a)  The employer did not develop and implement a written control of hazardous energy program (Lockout/Tagout) to include specific procedures and perform periodic inspections for equipment such as but not limited to:  John Deere excavator, can crusher, and Balemaster.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a)  The employer failed to develop, document, and utilized energy control procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities relating to servicing, maintenance, and set-up.  Specific procedures were required for equipment such as but not limited to:  John Deere excavator, can crusher, and Balemaster.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  (a)  The employer failed to re-evaluate the forklift operators to ensure the operators had the skills and knowledge to operate the powered industrial truck safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.253 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Inside of buildings, cylinders were not stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 feet (6.1 m) from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior:    (a)  In the Baler Shed, six oxygen cylinders and two acetylene cylinders were stored along a wall by the baler were not secured to prevent tipping.      (b)  In the Baler Shed, ten oxygen cylinders and two acetylene cylinders were stored along a wall by the exit door and overhead door were not secured to prevent tipping.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    (a) In the Big Blue Building, electrical disconnects for equipment such as but not limited transformer were not labeled to indicate what it was for.  Other disconnects along the wall also were not labeled, however, were in the "OFF" position.    (b)  In the Baler Shed, several electrical disconnects for equipment such as but not limited to:  bailer, main control, and machine center were not labeled to indicate what it was used for.    (c)  In the Dismantling Shed, electrical disconnects for equipment such as but not limited to:  low voltage outlets, hoist, and overhead doors were not labeled to indicate what it was for.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    (a)  In the Baler Shed, electrical disconnects were blocked and did not allow sufficient access and working space exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.    (b)  In the Dismantling Shed, electrical disconnects and electrical breaker panel was blocked and did not allow sufficient access and working space exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):     (a)  In the Big Blue Building; an exposed electrical panel was missing the dead front cover exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.  The panel was located to the left of the exit door when entering the building.     (b)  In the Big Blue Building; the bottom cover for the "Main Breaker for Control Panel" had been removed exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.     (c)  In the Dismantling Shed; an exposed electrical panel was missing the dead front cover exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors entered were not effectively closed:    (a) In the Big Blue Building, the electrical disconnect for the transformer was missing three knockouts exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.      (b)  In the Dismantling Shed, a quad electrical outlet box located by the exit door was missing a knockout exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.    (c) In the Big Blue Building, an electrical disconnect, located between the electrical breaker panel and the transformer disconnect, had the electrical conductor enter the top of the box and was not protected from abrasion exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 10 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Materials or equipment were placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route:  (a)  In the Baler Shed, oxygen cylinders were located in front of the exit door which was located next to an overhead door.  This did not allow for a safe means of egress.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340691567.