Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOSE L DIAZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE L DIAZ in 16101 IMPACT WAY, PFLUGERVILLE, TX 78660 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340697317.

Watch Jose L Diaz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose L Diaz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE L DIAZ
Site address
16101 IMPACT WAY
City
PFLUGERVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78660
Mailing
112 VERA DRIVE, SPICEWOOD, TX 78669
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.96

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.96: The employer did not ensure employees wear proper footwear which meets the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967.  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that closed toe work boots were worn on the construction site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, two employees were not wearing head protection while performing construction work, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by falling materials such as pneumatic hammers, and building materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, two employees were not protected by eye or face protection while using pneumatic hammers on the construction site, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by flying debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, a job made platform was supported by a Genie rough terrain forklift and was used to elevate personnel for framing activities. The employer who designed the platform was not qualified and/or did not adhere to published guidelines for safe use and design of elevating platforms and rough terrain forklifts, such as ASME/ANSI B56.6, 2005 and specifically, section 8.24, items such as:  a)  A platform floor having slip resistant surface. b)  A 4 inch minimum height toe plate which may be omitted at the access opening. c) Protection for personnel in their normal working position on the platform from moving parts of the rough terrain forklift truck that present a hazard. d) A means to securely attach the platform to the lifting mechanism, and to prevent the platform from inadvertent pivoting. e) Restraining means such as a guardrails or a means for securing personnel such as a fall protection harness.  Employees were exposed to pivoting, slippage or tipping of the platforms and forklift creating a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a competent person perform daily inspections of the job made scaffold platform, exposing employees to the hazards of falls and/or scaffold collapse/failure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, a wooden job made platform supported by a Genie rough terrain forklift was used to elevate personnel for construction work. The employer did not consult the manufacturer on the design of the platform and necessary changes to the forklift operational decals. Employees were exposed to the hazards of falls up to approximately 40 feet and/or scaffold collapse/failure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, a wooden job made platform installed on a Genie rough terrain forklift was used to elevate personnel to perform work on the commercial building under construction. The forklift was not designed for such use per the manufacturer's operations manuals, exposing employees to the hazards of falls of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:  On or about June 11, 2015, an employee worked from an elevated wooden job made platform that was not securely attached to the lift to prevent the platform from sliding off. The platform was used with a Genie rough terrain forklift to access elevated positions on the commercial building under construction, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees working from a wooden job made platform elevated by a Genie rough terrain forklift were protected from falls up to approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that workers on a scaffold platform were trained to recognize unsafe conditions, exposing employees to the hazards of falls and/or collapse/failure of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that workers who erected the scaffold platform were trained to recognize unsafe conditions, exposing employees to the hazards of falls and/or collapse/failure of the scaffold which was poorly designed and not approved for use on the Genie rough terrain forklift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at 1910.178(l) of this chapter.  Each powered industrial truck operator did not complete training as required.  29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5):  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the operator of the Genie rough terrain forklifts, Model GTH1056 was trained and certified in the safe operations of the forklift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Employees on walking/working surfaces with an unprotected side and/or edge which is 6 feet or more above a lower level were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  On or about June 11, 2015, and at times prior thereto, one employee was installing roof trusses on the commercial property under construction, exposing the employee to a fall hazard over 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about June 11, 2015, employees working on the commercial property under construction had not received training on the use of fall protection prior to being allowed to work in elevated places, exposing the employees to fall hazard of approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340697317.