Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: E LIQUID WHOLESALE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of E LIQUID WHOLESALE, INC. in 475 FENTRESS BLVD. UNIT L, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 340762483.

Watch E Liquid Wholesale, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E Liquid Wholesale, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
475 FENTRESS BLVD. UNIT L
City
DAYTONA BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32114
Mailing
475 FENTRESS BLVD. UNIT L, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1855

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   a. On or about July 8, 2015, employees used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to liquid nicotine while working in the main mixing lab and the employer did not develop or implement at the workplace a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1855

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  a. On or about July 8, 2015, the employer did not have a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical used by the employees such as, but not limited to liquid nicotine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1855

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a. On or about July 8, 2015, employees used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to liquid nicotine working in the main mixing lab and the employer did not provide an explanation of the new labeling system and safety data sheet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), and/or the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, (OSHA Form 300-A) and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment:  a. Located at E Liquid Wholesale, Inc., Daytona Beach, FL: On or about July, 8, 2015, the employer did not keep a log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), and/or the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, (OSHA Form 300-A) and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms for year 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1855

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. On or about July 8, 2015, an employee was required to wear a half face piece respirator when working with liquid nicotine in the main lab mixing room. The employer did not implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirators.    The employer did not implement and administer an effective respiratory protection program in that they did:    1) Designate a program administrator to oversee the respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3);    2) Provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1);    3) Ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting face-piece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2); and      4) Provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(k).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340762483.