Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EAST COAST ASPHALT LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of EAST COAST ASPHALT LLC in 1108 M STREET, WAYCROSS, GA 31501 (NAICS 324121). OSHA activity number 340835230.

Watch East Coast Asphalt LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for East Coast Asphalt LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1108 M STREET
City
WAYCROSS
State
GA
ZIP
31501
Mailing
822 RC DRIVE, DOUGLAS, GA 31535
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324121
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    (a)  At the asphalt silo, on or about August 5, 2015 and at times prior to, an employee was exposed to fall and struck by hazards when standing in the bucket of a skid steer to perform maintenance work while the employer did not ensure that work was being performed with a suitable means of access to the elevated work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $2025.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc:    (a)  In the rail car unloading area, a pit measuring approximately 50 inches in depth was not protected on one side (approximately 60 inch opening) from employees accidently walking in, exposing them to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2025
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.27 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.27(b)(3): Fastenings were not an integral part of the fixed ladder design:  (a)  In the rail car unloading area, a 50 inch access area below was provided with a fixed ladder without the benefit of fastenings(area configured for common practice of ladder use) to allow for frequent access, exposing an employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.110 D10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $3375.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(d)(10): Precautions were not taken to prevent damage to LP gas system(s) from vehicular traffic:    (a) In the fueling area, on or about August 5, 2015 and at times prior to, an LP gas system was not protected from vehicle and equipment traffic entering/exiting the fueling area, resulting in an explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3375
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $4725.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a)  At the asphalt silo, on or about August 5, 2015 and at times prior to, the procedure used by an employee to control hazardous energy for the asphalt silo retention gates was not documented exposing the employee to a caught-in and struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4725
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C04 II C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.  (a)  At the asphalt silo, on or about August 5, 2015 and at times prior to, the procedure used by an employee to remove an energy isolating device from the silo retention gates did not outline the safe removal of the device exposing the employee to a caught-in and struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  (a) In the fueling area and at the asphalt silo, on or about August 5, 2015, the employer did not ensure that hazardous chemicals such as diesel fuel and trisodium phosphate were properly labeled, exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340835230.