Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DUNHAM EXPRESS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DUNHAM EXPRESS CORPORATION in 3633 LEXINGTON AVENUE, MADISON, WI 53714 (NAICS 492110). OSHA activity number 340854363.

Watch Dunham Express Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dunham Express Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3633 LEXINGTON AVENUE
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53714
Mailing
795 VANDALIA STREET, SAINT PAUL, MN 55114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
492110
Employees
31
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 N01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4050.00 · Current $3848.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(1): Traffic regulations including authorized plant speed limits were not observed:    Employees operating the Toyota LP forklift (Serial No. 39430) did not observe plant speed limits at all times while operating the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3848
  • — Z (S) $4050

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3240.00 · Current $3240.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers had not developed, implemented, and maintained at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    On or about August 18, 2015, the employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained a written hazard communication program for hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, liquid propane and windshield washer solution.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3240
  • — Z (S) $3240

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 31 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3240.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer had not maintained in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and ensured that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees in their work area(s):    On or about August 18, 2015, the employer had not maintained safety data sheets (SDS) for each hazardous chemical such as, but not limited to, liquid propane and windshield washer solution.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3240

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3240.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:    Employees had not been provided with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area including, but not limited to, liquid propane and windshield washer solution.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3240

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):  Powered industrial truck(s) which were used on a round-the-clock basis were not examined for defects after each shift:  The Toyota LP forklift (Serial No. 39430) was used during multiple work shifts, and was not being inspected after each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

UPS

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340854363.