Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POC COLLISION INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of POC COLLISION INC. in 9 BURROWS STREET, SACO, ME 04072 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340865682.

Watch POC Collision INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for POC Collision INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
POC COLLISION INC.
Site address
9 BURROWS STREET
City
SACO
State
ME
ZIP
04072
Mailing
9 BURROWS STREET, SACO, ME 04072
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
17
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  9 Burrows St,  Saco ME- On or about August 18th, 2015, employer did not ensure employees had appropriate eye protection to protect from isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200:  9 Burrows Street Saco ME- On or about August 18, 2015, employer did not have a hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to isophorone diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate, toluene-2, 4- diisocyanate(TDI).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  9 Burrows Street, Saco ME - On or about August 18, 2015, employer did not provide effective training on the chemicals used such as but not limited to toluene diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   9 Burrows Street Saco ME- On or about August 18, 2015, employer did not have a written respiratory plan in place at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   9 Burrows Street Saco ME- On or about August 18, 2015, employer did not perform a medical evaluation to determine if the employee was medically verified to wear the respirator properly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT)  9 Burrows street Saco ME 04072- On or about August 18, 2015, employee were wearing Sperian half-faced respirator with organic vapor cartridges for protection against isocyanates without fit testing being done.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting face pieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the face piece and the face or that interfered with valve function   9 Burrows Street Saco ME- On or about August 18, 2015, an employee was wearing a half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges, while having facial hair that interfered with the proper seal of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 107315392470H130

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:   9 Burrows Street Saco ME- On or about August 18 2015, employer did not provide adequate training to employees as to proper usage of respirator, while performing spraying activities with isocyanates mixture in sprayer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340865682.