Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WHITE PLAINS CENTER FOR NURSING CARE LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WHITE PLAINS CENTER FOR NURSING CARE LLC in 220 W POST RD., WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 340866441.

Watch White Plains Center FOR Nursing Care LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for White Plains Center FOR Nursing Care LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
220 W POST RD.
City
WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10606
Mailing
220 W POST RD., WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $2160.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye when exposed to eye or face hazards from liquid chemicals, acids and/or caustic liquids:    a) Kitchen:  Employees handled and used various chemical cleaners including but not limited to:  Easy-Off Heavy Duty Cleaner (sodium hydroxide), Santec Resolve Zero Lime Scale Remover (uranium hydrogen sulphate), Santec Resolve Five (sodium hydroxide), etc. and were not required to use appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles) on or about 8/21/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $2160.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:      a) Kitchen:  Employees handled and used various chemical cleaners including but not limited to:  Easy-Off Heavy Duty Cleaner (sodium hydroxide), Santec Resolve Zero Lime Scale Remover (uranium hydrogen sulphate), Santec Resolve Five (sodium hydroxide), etc. and the employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection (e.g., (e.g., chemical resistant gloves); on or about 8/21/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 75 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a)  Entire Facility:  Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nurse Aides had occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens the facility did not establish a site specific written exposure control plan; on or about 11/23/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 C01 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 75 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The Employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain the schedule and method of implementation for paragraphs (d) Methods of Compliance, (f) Hepatitis B Vaccination and Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up, (g) Communication of Hazards to Employees, and (h) Recordkeeping, of this standard.  a)  Entire Facility:  Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nurse Aides had occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens the facility's exposure control plan did not contain the schedule and method of implementation of (d) methods of compliance (e.g., use of engineering controls); (f) Hepatitis B Vaccination; (g) Communication of Hazards to Employees; and (h) Recordkeeping; on or about 11/23/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure:    a) Entire Facility:  Certified Nurse Aides were identified by the employer as having occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and the employer did not make the Hepatitis B vaccination to them; on or about 11/17/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    a)  Entire Facility:  Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nurse Aides had occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and all employees with occupational exposure were not provided with blooodborne pathogen training; on or about 11/23/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $2160.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Kitchen:  Employees handled and used various chemical cleaners including but not limited to:  Easy-Off Heavy Duty Cleaner (sodium hydroxide), Santec Resolve Zero Lime Scale Remover (uranium hydrogen sulphate), Santec Resolve Five (sodium hydroxide), etc. and the employer did not implement a written hazard communication program; on or about 8/21/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  a) Kitchen:  Employees handled and used various chemical cleaners including but not limited to:  Easy-Off Heavy Duty Cleaner (sodium hydroxide), Santec Resolve Zero Lime Scale Remover (uranium hydrogen sulphate), Santec Resolve Five (sodium hydroxide), etc. and the employer did not provide training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area; on or about 8/21/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): The employer did not enter each recordable injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log and 301 Incident Report within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness had occurred:    a) Kitchen Area:   A workplace illness which occurred on or about 7/21/15 and resulted in lost work time was not recorded on the 2015 OSHA-300 log; on or about 8/31/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $540
  • — Z (O) $900

1910.1030 H02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 75 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(2)(ii): Employee training records for bloodborne pathogens were not maintained for 3 years from the date on which the training occurred:  a)  Entire Facility:  Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Certified Nurses Aides had occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and the facility did not maintain training records for bloodborne pathogens; on or about 1/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340866441.