Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: K.A. FICHANDLER, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of K.A. FICHANDLER, LLC in 217 HEBRON AVENUE, GLASTONBURY, CT 06033 (NAICS 445291). OSHA activity number 340884980.

Watch K.A. Fichandler, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K.A. Fichandler, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
217 HEBRON AVENUE
City
GLASTONBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06033
Mailing
948 CROMWELL AVENUE, ROCKY HILL, CT 06067
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445291
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, the company had not conducted a personal protective equipment hazard assessment to determine what personal protective equipment was required to be worn by employees to protect against chemical hazards such as corrosive liquids and irritants and also hot cleaning liquids when cleaning the grill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:     Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, employees were not provided with and required to wear protective eye equipment when using corrosive cleaners such as Clorox Germicidal Bleach and Like Magic Degreaser and when cleaning the grill using 3M Scotch-Brite Clean Griddle No. 700.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, employees were not provided with and required to wear chemical resistant gloves when using corrosive and irritating cleaners such as Clorox Germicidal Bleach, Like Magic Degreaser and 3M Scotch-Brite Clean Griddle No. 700.  The only gloves provided for use were synthetic disposable food preparation gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1820.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  Kitchen Area:  On, or about, August 27, 2015, the employer had not developed and implemented a lockout/tagout program to protect employees while maintaining and cleaning food service equipment.  An employee suffered severe finger lacerations while unjamming a Berkel Model 829A food slicer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1820
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, an eyewash was not provided in the work area where corrosive chemicals such as, but not limited to, Clorox Germicidal Bleach and Like Magic degreaser were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1040.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, the company had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication Program to inform and train employees regarding the safe use and handling of cleaning chemicals.  Corrosive chemical such as, but not limited to, Clorox Germicidal Bleach and Like Magic Degreaser, were provided for use.  Also, 3M Scotch-Brite Quick Clean Griddle Liquid No. 700, an irritant, was provided for use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1040
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): Identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein; and,  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, spray containers labeled as Clorox Green Works actually contained a solution of bleach and water.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  Bakery:  On, or about, August 31, 2015, spray bottles that contained a bleach solution were not marked or labeled to show the hazard warning associated with the chemical.  The bottles had the label for the original cleaner they contained, Clorox Green Works.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340884980.