BRUNSWICK, GA —
OSHA Inspection: DEVSU CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DEVSU CORPORATION in 300 CARY STREET, BRUNSWICK, GA 31520 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 340904416.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DEVSU CORPORATION
- Site address
- 300 CARY STREET
- City
- BRUNSWICK
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31520
- Mailing
- 1008 YOUNG WAY, RICHMOND HILL, GA 31324
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not prepare and maintain a written respiratory protection program for an employee who was required to wear a respirator, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide the proper respiratory protection for an employee who was required to wear a respirator while utilizing chlorine bleach, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for an employee who was required to wear a respirator, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure that a fit test was performed for an employee who was required to wear a respirator, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did provide sufficient respiratory protection training for an employee who was required to wear a respirator, resulting in a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not prepare and maintain a written hazard communication program for an employee who was required to spray chlorine bleach, resulting in a chemical exposure hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) In the guest rooms, on or about September 9, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide sufficient chemical handling/use training for an employee who was required to spray chlorine bleach, resulting in a chemical exposure hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
LAS VEGAS, NV—2026-07-13
THE BERKLEY LAS VEGAS
LYNCHBURG, VA—2026-07-10
RIVERFRONT HOSPITALITY LLC
INCLINE VILLAGE, NV—2026-07-09
SHANTI RAHM LLC.
INCLINE VILLAGE, NV—2026-07-09
SHANTI RAHM LLC.
ISELIN, NJ—2026-07-09
DELTA HOTELS WOODBRIDGE
More inspections in GA
ROME, GA—2026-07-13
CAMP INDUSTRIES
SOUTH FULTON, GA—2026-07-10
REEDWICK, LLC
CONYERS, GA—2026-07-10
GOLDEN STATE FOODS
DALTON, GA—2026-07-10
ENGINEERED FLOORS, LLC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340904416.