Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SUNRISE RECYCLING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUNRISE RECYCLING, LLC in 4801 SOUTH LAMAR, DALLAS, TX 75215 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340929397.

Watch Sunrise Recycling, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sunrise Recycling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4801 SOUTH LAMAR
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75215
Mailing
4801 SOUTH LAMAR, DALLAS, TX 75215
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $425.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees    (a) In the warehouse department, where employees operating a Hyundai model HLF30-5 forklift with a defective seat belt were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $425
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $425.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    (a) Torch cutting area, the employer failed to assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when employees are performing torch cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $425
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  (a) Torch cutting area, the employer failed to select appropriate hand protection when employees were performing arc cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $425.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by 29 CFR 1910.178(l):    a) Throughout the workplace employees operated Hyundai HLP30-5 forklift trucks without having first completed training of consisting formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $425
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.252 B02 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $425.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(A): Helmets or hand shields were not used during all arc welding or arc cutting operations:     a) Torch cutting area, the employer failed to provide employees with a helmet when performing arc cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $425
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.252 B02 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $425.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(B): Goggles or other suitable eye protection were not used during all gas welding or oxygen cutting operations:    (a) Torch cutting area, the employer failed to select goggles or other suitable eye protection when employees were performing arc cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $425
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1025 L01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $275.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025:     (a) Arc torch cutting area, the employer does not provide lead training to employee(s) performing arc torching activities where dry scrap metal is used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $275
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1027 M04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1027(m)(4)(i): The employer did not institute a training program for all employees who were potentially exposed to cadmium, ensure employee participation in the program, and maintain a record of the contents of such program:  (a) Arc torch cutting area, the employer does not provide cadmium training to employee(s) performing arc torching activities where dry scrap metal is used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Throughout the workplace, at least two (2) employees were exposed to skin contact and inhalation hazards during scrap metal operations and tasks involving the use of lead, cadmium, iron oxide, and manganese . No written program had been implemented to communicate chemical hazards and protection measures to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340929397.