Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CALI J & CO.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CALI J & CO. in 654 MAIN AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06851 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 340945112.

Watch Cali J & CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cali J & CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CALI J & CO.
Site address
654 MAIN AVENUE
City
NORWALK
State
CT
ZIP
06851
Mailing
11 MEADOW STREET, NORWALK, CT 06854
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  JOBSITE:  The fabricated frame scaffold platform, from which the employees were working to cut a steel beam, was not fully planked or decked.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  JOBSITE:  The fabricated frame scaffold, from which employees were working at a height 13 feet 9 inches above the ground was not erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  JOBSITE:  The fabricated frame scaffold platform, from which employees were required to work at a height 13 feet 9 inches from the ground was not equipped with a proper and safe means of access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  JOBSITE:  The employees, working from the fabricated frame scaffold platform to cut steel beams were not protected from the hazard of falling 13 feet 9 inches to the ground by the use of guardrail systems, personal fall arrest devices or other safe means.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  JOBSITE:  The employees, who were working from a fabricated frame scaffold platform without fall protection at a height of 13 feet 9 inches above the ground were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations:  JOBSITE:  The employer did not ensure through not only having an engineering survey done by a competent person to determine the conditions of the structures, but also performing preparatory operations tasks, such as (but not limited to) overall planning the work, methods to be used, the equipment necessary, the measures to be used, and prohibiting employees in the danger zones during the demolition operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340945112.