Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ENTERA, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ENTERA, LLC in 1200 ENTERA DR, PANAMA CITY, FL 32405 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 340962695.

Watch Entera, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Entera, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ENTERA, LLC
Site address
1200 ENTERA DR
City
PANAMA CITY
State
FL
ZIP
32405
Mailing
1200 ENTERA DR, PANAMA CITY, FL 32405
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339950
Employees
88
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015, on the west side of the plant in the crating and packing areas, employees were lifting loads being handled by a one ton CM Valustar hoist with an inoperative safety latch on the hook, employees were not protected from struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.252 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2380.00 · Current $1428.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.132:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015, on the north side of the plant in the welding areas, employees were using mig welders without wearing protective clothing to protect them from short duration flame exposures, exposing employees to burns and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 54 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015, throughout the plant, the employer did not verify what personal protective equipment (PPE) was necessary to ensure employees using cranes, pneumatic nail guns, grinders, power saws, and a variety of mechanical machines, what hazards were present, exposing the employees to struck-by, and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2380.00 · Current $1428.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): Sling(s) that were damaged or defective were used:  a.   On or about October 5, 2015, on the east side of the plant in the welding and crane area, employees were using slings that had rips and tears and did not have legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.    b.  On or about October 5, 2015, on the west side of the plant in packing and crating area, employees were using slings that had rips and tears and did not have legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures were not permanent, continuous, and effective:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015, in the center of the plant, the FHS 3 Ton crane did not have a grounding system installed, exposing employees to an electrical hazard.    b.  On or about October 5, 2015, in the center of the plant, the Trambeam 3 Ton crane did not have a grounding system installed, exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $595.00 · Current $357.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer had not ensured that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l) [Reference 29 CFR 1926.602(d) for construction]:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015 at Entera, LLC, throughout the facility, the employer did not ensure that employees successfully completed training in the operation of the forklifts, exposing employees to struck-by and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $357
  • — Z (O) $595

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a.   On or about October 5, 2015, at Entera, LLC throughout the facility, employees were operating forklifts daily without examining the conditions of the forklift before use, exposing employees to struck-by hazards, broken bones, and fractures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340962695.