Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: K & M MILLWRIGHT, LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of K & M MILLWRIGHT, LLC in 880 HWY 82 W., GREENVILLE, MS 38701 (NAICS 238290). OSHA activity number 341058279.

Watch K & M Millwright, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K & M Millwright, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
880 HWY 82 W.
City
GREENVILLE
State
MS
ZIP
38701
Mailing
1383 MISSLEBASE RD., JUDSONIA, AR 72081
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238290
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1475.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Public Law 91-596, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 5(a)(1):  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees, in that employees were exposed to a struck by hazard by attaching a sling to crane load line above overhaul ball.      (a)  Boom Truck Crane - On or about November 17, 2015 a sling used for removing a spout was attached the crane load line above the overhaul ball.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1475
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5350.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the condition of the framing, floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations.     (a)  Feed Mill - On or about November 17, 2015 a platform collapsed and fell 50 feet while an employee was cutting a spout flange from a hopper that was attached to the platform.  An engineering survey was not conducted prior to the dismantling of conveyors, spouts and platforms to determine how the platforms were connected to the structure and the possibility of an unexpected collapse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5350
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.1412 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1475.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1412(f)(1): The equipment was not inspected at least every 12 months by a qualified person in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    (a)  Boom Truck Crane - On or about November 17, 2015 a Manitex 22101S truck mounted boom crane was past due for an annual inspection.  The last annual inspection was conducted in June 2014.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1475
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1417 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): The procedures applicable to the operation of the equipment, including rated capacities (load charts), recommended operating speeds, special hazard warnings, instructions, and operator's manual, were not readily available in the cab at all times for use by the operator.     (a)  Boom Truck Crane - On or about November 17, 2015 the operators' manual for the Manitex 22101S truck mounted boom crane was not available at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1431 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(a): The use of equipment to hoist employees was not prohibited except where the employer demonstrates that the erection, use, and dismantling of conventional means of reaching the work area, such as a personnel hoist, ladder, stairway, aerial lift, elevating work platform, or scaffold, would be more hazardous, or is not possible because of the projects structural design or worksite conditions.     (a)  Feed Mill - On or about November 17, 2015 a personnel platform was used to hoist employees to elevated work areas instead using other safer equipment, such as, an aerial lift, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1431 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(b)(1):  When using equipment to hoist employees, the employees were not in a personnel platform that meets the requirements of paragraph (e) of this section.     (a)  Feed Mill - On or about November 17, 2015 a personnel platform used for hoisting employees was not designed as required by 29 CFR 1926.1431(e):     1. A qualified person familiar with structural design did not design the personnel platform and attachment/suspension system used for hoisting personnel.   2. The suspension system was not designed to minimize tipping of the platform due to movement of employees occupying the platform.   3. The personnel platform itself (excluding the guardrail system and personal fall arrest system anchorages), was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least five times the maximum intended load.     4. The weight of the platform and its rated capacity was not conspicuously posted on the platform with a plate or other permanent marking.    5. Points to which personal fall arrest systems are attached did not meet the anchorage requirements in subpart M of this part. Anchors were not available inside the personnel platform.   6. The system used to connect the personnel platform to the equipment did not allow the platform to remain within 10 degrees of level, regardless of boom angle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1431 D05 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(d)(5)(v): Anti-two block device was removed during personnel lifting operations:    (a)  Boom Truck Crane - On or about November 17, 2015 a Monitex 22101S boom truck crane used to hoist employees in a personnel platform did not have an anti-two block device connected to the boom. The boom crane was mounted on 2003 Sterling flatbed truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1431 G04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(g)(4): Eyes in wire rope slings used for lifting a personnel platform were not fabricated with thimbles.    (a)  Personnel Platform - On or about November 17, 2015 the eyes of a wire rope sling used for lifting a personnel platform were not fabricated with thimbles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1431 K10 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1431(k)(10)(i):  employee(s) occupying the personnel platform did not use a personal fall arrest system. The system must be attached to a structural member within the personnel platform. When working over or near water, the requirements of � 1926.106 apply.    (a)  Feed Mill - On or about November 17, 2015 an employee did not use a personal fall arrest system while hoisted in a personnel platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341058279.