Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO PACHECO

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PEDRO PACHECO in 5710 N. 153RD AVE, OMAHA, NE 68116 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341078533.

Watch Pedro Pacheco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Pacheco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PEDRO PACHECO
Site address
5710 N. 153RD AVE
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68116
Mailing
5702 S. 13TH STREET, OMAHA, NE 68107
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  The employer is failing to protect employees from struck by hazards associated with operating equipment or machinery used in building a new residential construction.  The most recent occurrence of this happened on a job site located at 5710 N. 153rd Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer had employees using nail guns rated between 80-120 PSI to install roof shingles on a new residential home without wearing any eye or face protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system(s):  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with roofing a new residential construction where the roof pitch is greater than 4:12 and the ground to eave height is greater than 6 feet.  The most recent occurrence of this happened on a job site located at 5710 N. 153rd Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer had employees roofing the home without using any form of fall protection
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  The employer failed to train employees to recognized the fall hazards associated with roofing a new residential construction where the roof pitch is greater than 4:12 and the ground to eave height is greater than 6 feet.  The most recent occurrence of this happened on a job site located at 5710 N. 153rd Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer had untrained employees roofing the home understanding only that the boss says they need fall protection instead of recognizing the need to protect against fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with using a ladder to roof a new residential construction.  The most recent occurrence of this happened on a job site located at 5710 N. 153rd Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer had employees using an unmarked 25 foot aluminum extension ladder as means of access and egress of the roof on the new home they were roofing, without having extended the ladder at least three feet over the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:   The employer failed to train the employees to recognized fall hazards associated with using a ladder to access and egress a roof of a new residential construction.  The most recent occurrence of this happened on a job site located at 5710 N. 153rd Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer had untrained employees failing to recognize the hazard in using an unmarked 25 foot aluminum extension ladder as means of access and egress of the roof on the new home they were roofing, and ladder was not extended a minimum of three feet over the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341078533.