Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DIEGO PUENTE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DIEGO PUENTE in 181 LONGVIEW AVE., WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341090967.

Watch Diego Puente — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Diego Puente is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DIEGO PUENTE
Site address
181 LONGVIEW AVE.
City
WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10605
Mailing
14 INGALLS AVE., NORWALK, CT 06854
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  location: entire site on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees, working below roofing activities, were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:  location: roof on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing work, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  location: entire site on or about: 11/25/15  a) An employee, engaged in residential roofing, was not protected from falling 20 feet. The employee was not provided with any fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did notl extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.   location: roof perimeter on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees were using portable metal ladders to access the roof. The ladders did not extend 3' above the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    location: roof perimeter on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees were using portable metal ladders to access the roof.The lanyards, connecting the 2 flys of the ladders, were missing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.    location: roof perimeter on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees were using a portable metal ladder to access the roof. The ladder had a broken rung.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:   location: entire site on or about: 11/25/15  a) Employees were using portable extension ladders while engaged in roofing activities. The employees were not provided with ladder safety training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341090967.