Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRIDE CLEANING & RESTORATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRIDE CLEANING & RESTORATION, INC. in 2437 LEMP AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63104 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 341106169.

Watch Pride Cleaning & Restoration, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pride Cleaning & Restoration, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2437 LEMP AVENUE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63104
Mailing
2437 LEMP AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63104
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use  In various restoration and cleaning site, where the workers were provided and were required tight fitting respirators, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.  At various cleaning and restoration sites, where employees wear tight fitting full face and disposable respirators while performing restoration work, the employer did not provide the workers medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION/CONDITION) (DESCRIBE HAZARD)  At various cleaning and restoration sites, where workers wear tight fitting full face and disposable respirators during restoration work, the workers were not fit tested with the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  Where workers wear respirators during cleaning and restoration activities, the employer did not train the employees with respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Where employees used hazardous chemicals for cleaning and restoration operations, of residential buildings, the employer did not give the workers training on hazards of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   In the warehouse, where employees handled corrosive chemicals, an eye wash apparatus with quick drenching capacity was not made available.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341106169.