Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DOLLAMUR SPORT SERVICES

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DOLLAMUR SPORT SERVICES in 1734 E. EL PASO ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102 (NAICS 339920). OSHA activity number 341142131.

Watch Dollamur Sport Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dollamur Sport Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1734 E. EL PASO ST.
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76102
Mailing
1734 E. EL PASO ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76102
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339920
Employees
90
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $1980.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards from non-rated lifting devices.      The employer failed to ensure that the eight (8) foot spreader bar lifting device used in the production department was inspected and rated for its load rating, exposing employees to struck by hazards.  The lifting device is used to move or to position the 6 foot (72 inch) "Prepped Foam" rolls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $3465.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    The employer failed to develop and implement written lockout/tagout procedures for each type of machine located within the plant.  Employees performing maintenance work on the equipment such as, but not limited to the Tri-Laminator, bi-laminators, water jet machines and a Velcro applicator were exposed to electrocution, caught-in, and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3465
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees.   The employer failed to develop and implement lockout/tagout training to employees.   Employees performing maintenance work on the equipment such as, but not limited to the Tri-Laminator, bi-laminators, water jet machines and a Velcro applicator were exposed to electrocution and or amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5400.00 · Current $2970.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that each power industrial truck operator was competent to operate a power industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l):      The employer did not ensure employees required to operate the Clark forklifts throughout the plant were trained on the safe operations of the powered industrial trucks.  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2970
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.184 E02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $1485.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(2)(i): Hooks, rings, oblong links, pear shaped links, welded or mechanical coupling links or other attachments did not have a rated capacity at least equal to that of the alloy steel chain with which they were used or the sling was used in excess of the rated capacity of the weakest component.       The employer did not ensure hooks used on the spreader bar in the Production department used to aid in the process of rigging up and/or moving completed "prepped foam" rolls were rated, stamped and inspected.  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1485
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.184 E03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(ii): Records of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly inspected were not available for examination:   The employer did not record chain slings as being inspected on the spreader bar in the Production department that were used to aid in the process of rigging up and/or moving completed "prepped foam" rolls.  Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341142131.