DUNEDIN, FL —
OSHA Inspection: SHADOW-CASTER LED LIGHTING LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SHADOW-CASTER LED LIGHTING LLC in 1237 LADY MARION LN., DUNEDIN, FL 34698 (NAICS 335110). OSHA activity number 341197143.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SHADOW-CASTER LED LIGHTING LLC
- Site address
- 1237 LADY MARION LN.
- City
- DUNEDIN
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34698
- Mailing
- 1237 LADY MARION LN., DUNEDIN, FL 34698
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335110
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Shop - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Shop - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to products such as, but not limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a. Shop - the employer did not provide a written certification of hazard assessment for personal protective equipment when chemicals such as, but limited to coating, hexavalent chromium, lead, acetone, polish, solvent, and compounds were used. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a. Shop - the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D when dust masks were voluntarily used. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a. Shop - for the employees that performed lead tinning and soldering operations, the employer did not provide an initial determination. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a. Buffing room - for the employees that performed lead tinning and soldering operations, the employer did not provide a determination for the Chromium (VI) 8-hour time-weighted average exposure. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1026 J01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(j)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that all spills and releases of chromium (VI)-containing material were cleaned up promptly: a. Buffing room - materials containing chromium (VI) on surfaces were not promptly cleaned up. Violation observed on or about 1/22/16.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335110)
FLORA, IL—2026-04-22
NORTH AMERICAN LIGHTING, INC.
HILLSBOROUGH, NH—2025-08-20
AMS OSRAM USA, INC.
HILLSBOROUGH, NH—2025-03-24
OSRAM SYLVANIA INC.
WAVERLY, MN—2024-10-03 00:00:00
108207 - PRO PDR INC DBA PRO PDR SOLUTIONS
WAVERLY, MN—2024-10-03 00:00:00
108200 - PRO PDR INC DBA PRO PDR SOLUTIONS
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
MELBOURNE, FL—2026-07-13
OMNIPOTENT BRANDS, LLC
QUINCY, FL—2026-07-13
WALMART
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
CLEARWATER, FL—2026-07-10
ROOFTECH ROOFING & WATERPROOFING INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341197143.