HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MARVIN CASCO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARVIN CASCO in 6175 E. SAM HOUSTON PKWY N, HOUSTON, TX 77049 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 341211274.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARVIN CASCO
- Site address
- 6175 E. SAM HOUSTON PKWY N
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77049
- Mailing
- 1007 PARK LANE, PASADENA, TX 77506
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: "AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d)" On or about January 26, 2016, an employee on the north site of the construction site were exposed to a fall hazard when painting from the platform of a JLG Skytrak rough terrain forklift without the operator having had formal instruction and evaluation of their performance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1440.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about January 26, 2016, on the north side of the construction site, three employees were operating equipment and painting metal framework from elevated heights without being trained on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about January 26, 2016, on the north side of the building, employees were exposed to a flying object hazard when spraying paint primer without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about January 26, 2016, on the north side of the construction site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard exceeding 10 feet when painting metal framing from a platform attached to the forks of a JLG rough terrain forklift without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about January 26, 2016, an employee was observed applying Sherwin-Williams Shopcoat Primer without respiratory protection. The employer did not have a Respiratory Protection Program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $240
- — Z (O) $400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about January 26, 2016, employees were allowed to apply chemical products without the employer having developed a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
NAMPA, ID—2026-07-15
ELITE STEEL ERECTORS, LLC
GARDENDALE, AL—2026-07-09
ANDINO'S IRON WORKERS, LLC
MIDLOTHIAN, VA—2026-07-09
B & J STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LYNCHBURG, VA—2026-07-09
GRAY'S WELDING LLC
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341211274.