Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NUMAT SYSTEMS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NUMAT SYSTEMS, LLC in 66276 HIGHWAY 22, ROANOKE, AL 36274 (NAICS 811490). OSHA activity number 341298917.

Watch Numat Systems, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Numat Systems, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NUMAT SYSTEMS, LLC
Site address
66276 HIGHWAY 22
City
ROANOKE
State
AL
ZIP
36274
Mailing
P.O. BOX 306, ROANOKE, AL 36274
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811490
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:     a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, a grinder operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 158% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average level (TWA) or an equivalent level of approximately 93.3 dBA. The sampling was conducted for 420 minutes during one shift on March 8, 2016.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 60 minutes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:     a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, a grinder operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 158% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average level (TWA) or an equivalent level of approximately 93.3 dBA. The sampling was conducted for 420 minutes during one shift on March 8, 2016.  Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time of 60 minutes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, a written respiratory protection program had not been developed and implemented for employees required by the employer to wear North half-facepiece respirators when grinding rubber mats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, medical evaluations were not provided to employees required, by the employer, to wear North half-facepiece respirators when grinding rubber mats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, dust from grinding rubber mats was allowed to accumulate on the floors and walls of the work area.  b) On or about March 3, 2016 - Break area, water was allowed to leak and accumulate onto surfaces such as, but not limited to, the countertop.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, fit tests were not provided for employees required by the employer to wear North half-facepiece respirators when grinding rubber mats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Grinding room, the employer allowed employees with facial hair to wear tight-fitting respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Facility, a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented for employees working in and around chemicals including, but not limited to, propane and rubber compounds.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about March 3, 2016 - Facility, employees were not provided effective information and training regarding the hazards associated chemicals including, but not limited to, propane and rubber compounds.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341298917.