DUMAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SPECIALIZED DAIRY SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SPECIALIZED DAIRY SERVICES, INC. in 415 SUCCESS BLVD, DUMAS, TX 79029 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 341341071.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SPECIALIZED DAIRY SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 415 SUCCESS BLVD
- City
- DUMAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79029
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2080, DUMAS, TX 79029
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311119
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program for employees who wore respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer did not ensure employees were medical evaluated prior to wearing a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: The employed did not ensure employees who wore a respirator were fit -tested prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: The employer did not provide training to employees who were required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks: The employer did not ensure forklift operators were trained to operate forklifts: a.) Nissan - 257H
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 Q01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel: The employer did not ensure a forklift horn was repaired. a.) Nissan - 257H
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: The employer did not establish and implement a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: The employer did not ensure employees were trained on the hazards of the chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311119)
CHILLICOTHE, MO—2026-06-30
MILBANK MILLS INC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT—2026-06-25
INVE AQUACULTURE INC
GREELEY, CO—2026-06-16
GREELEY SEED CO., LLC
HELM, CA—2026-06-15
B&R CUSTOM CHOPPING LLC
LEXINGTON, NE—2026-06-05
LIVESTOCK NUTRITION CENTER
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341341071.