OSHA Inspection: MARQUIS AUTO RESTORATION

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4276.00 · Current $2779.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) Marquis Auto Restoration - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear half face elastomeric respirators such as, but not limited to, 3M7502 respirator with organic vapor cartridge and prefilter, etc.  Condition noted on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)  Marquis Auto Restoration - Employees required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, 3M 7502 series half mask respirators while performing auto body repair work had not received a medical evaluation prior to being fit tested. Conditions noted on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:  a) Marquis Auto Restoration - Employees engaged in auto body repair and painting that were required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, 3M 7502 elastomeric half face with organic vapor cartridges, etc. were not provided with effective training.  Conditions noted on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2850.00 · Current $1853.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Marquis Auto Restoration - A written hazard communication program was not developed, implemented, and maintained at the workplace where employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, methanol, ammonium hydroxide, etc. contained in CMA Refinishing Solutions Strip it Dry, etc.  Conditions noted on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a) Marquis Auto Restoration - Employees were not informed of the chemical hazards of products used in the workplace such as, but not limited to, methanol, ammonium hydroxide, etc. contained in CMA Refinishing Solutions Strip-it-dry, etc. as the employer did not provide safety data sheets.  Conditions noted on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Marquis Auto Restoration - Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area including, but not limited to, methanol, ammonium hydroxide, etc. contained in CMA Refinishing Solutions Strip-it-dry, etc.  Observed on or about March 28, 2016.

Issued

2016-09-28 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer was not responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  Marquis Auto Restoration - The Employer did not assure portable fire extinguishers were inspected, maintained and tested in the workplace.  Observed on or about March 28, 2016.