Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN AND RICARDO ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN AND RICARDO ROOFING in 235 NORTH DUFFY STREET, BUTLER, PA 16001 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341428324.

Watch Martin AND Ricardo Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin AND Ricardo Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
235 NORTH DUFFY STREET
City
BUTLER
State
PA
ZIP
16001
Mailing
1400 SARATOGA AVENUE, MORGANTOWN, WV 26505
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   a) Job site, 235 North Duffy Road, Butler, PA: On or about April 26, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that each employee wore eye protection when operating nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:   a) Job site, 235 North Duffy Road, Butler, PA: On or about April 26, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that all employees used fall protection systems/devices where exposed to fall hazards of at least 17 feet, 7 inches in height.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   a) Job site, 235 North Duffy Road, Butler, PA: On or about April 26, 2016, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that a ladder used by employees to gain access to/egress from the roof was extended at least 3 feet above the roof line in that it was extended approximately 2 1/2 feet above the roof line.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341428324.