Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DONALD F. OLIVER HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DONALD F. OLIVER HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC in 345-347 SAVIN AVENUE, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341430643.

Watch Donald F. Oliver Home Improvement LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Donald F. Oliver Home Improvement LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
345-347 SAVIN AVENUE
City
WEST HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06516
Mailing
175 SURREY DRIVE, ORANGE, CT 06477
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas:    JOBSITE:  The construction debris, such as (but not limited to) broken pieces of lumber with protruding nails, paper scraps and broken pieces of roof shingles was scattered in and around the walking/working areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    JOBSITE:  The employee who was removing old roofing material from the steep (8 in 12 pitched) roof was not protected from the hazard of falling 21 feet 5 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest systems or other equivalent means.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    JOBSITE:  The employee, exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing work on the steep (8 in 12 pitched) roof was not provided with information and training to recognize the hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.:  JOBSITE:  The employees, using the Werner 32 feet aluminum extension ladder to gain access to the roof were not provided with training and information to recognize hazards related to ladders and minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    JOBSITE:  The side rails of the Werner 32-foot aluminum extension ladder that was used by the employee to gain access to the roof were not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  JOBSITE:  The Werner 32-foot aluminum extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof was set so the horizontal distance of the base of the ladder to the vertical support was greater than one-fourth (1/4) of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341430643.