FOREST, MS —
OSHA Inspection: PHENIX TRANSPORTATION WEST, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PHENIX TRANSPORTATION WEST, INC. in I-20 FRONTAGE ROAD, FOREST, MS 39074 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 341522779.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PHENIX TRANSPORTATION WEST, INC.
- Site address
- I-20 FRONTAGE ROAD
- City
- FOREST
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39074
- Mailing
- P.O. DRAWER D, FOREST, MS 39074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484121
- Employees
- 260
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and trapdoor floor opening, infrequently used, was not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was not protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings: (a) Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, the employer failed to properly guard pit openings: Instance 1: Truck Shop Instance 2: Trailer Shop
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4250.00 · Current $2550.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, employees were using corrosive chemicals, such as but not limited to Aluminum Brightener II without an eyewash station.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2550
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.178 L01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3400.00 · Current $2040.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that each power industrial truck operator was competent to operate a power industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (1): (a) Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and times prior, the employer had not provided powered industrial truck training to employees who operate forklifts. Instance A: Truck Shop Instance B: Trailer Shop
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2040
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2550.00 · Current $1530.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility - (a) On or about June 3, 2016, the employer's hazard communication program was deficient in that they have not developed a written program with a chemical inventory listing or provided employee training as required by the Hazard Communication standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1530
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: (i) Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; (ii) Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and (iii) Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. (a) Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, employees were using hazardous chemicals including Aluminum Brightener II and the employer had not conducted a hazard assessment of the facility to determine the personal protective equipment (PPE) needed to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484121)
YUMA, AZ—2026-07-07
RFX2026XMG193X0063 - HOGAN DEDICATED SERVICES LLC DBA HOGAN TRANSPORTS
OAKLAND, CA—2026-07-07
ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC.
CHARLOTTE, NC—2026-07-06
161495 - FATHER - SONS LLC
SMYRNA, TN—2026-07-06
SILK WAY TRANSPORT, INC
KELLER, TX—2026-06-29
SHOW 1 LOGISTICS
More inspections in MS
LAUREL, MS—2026-07-01
THERMO-KOOL
HORN LAKE, MS—2026-07-01
NEWLY WEDS FOODS, INC.
GAUTIER, MS—2026-07-01
DOUBLE R GAUTIER, LLC
OLIVE BRANCH, MS—2026-06-30
HYVE SOLUTIONS
GAUTIER, MS—2026-06-30
STEVE WILSON ENTERPRISE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341522779.