Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PHENIX TRANSPORTATION WEST, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PHENIX TRANSPORTATION WEST, INC. in I-20 FRONTAGE ROAD, FOREST, MS 39074 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 341522779.

Watch Phenix Transportation West, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phenix Transportation West, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
I-20 FRONTAGE ROAD
City
FOREST
State
MS
ZIP
39074
Mailing
P.O. DRAWER D, FOREST, MS 39074
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
260
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A05

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and trapdoor floor opening, infrequently used, was not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction.  While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was not protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings:  (a) Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, the employer failed to properly guard pit openings:  Instance 1:  Truck Shop Instance 2:  Trailer Shop
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4250.00 · Current $2550.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a)  Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, employees were using corrosive chemicals, such as but not limited to Aluminum Brightener II without an eyewash station.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.178 L01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3400.00 · Current $2040.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that each power industrial truck operator was competent to operate a power industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (1):  (a)  Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and times prior, the employer had not provided powered industrial truck training to employees who operate forklifts.  Instance A:  Truck Shop Instance B:  Trailer Shop
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2040
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2550.00 · Current $1530.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Facility - (a) On or about June 3, 2016, the employer's hazard communication program was deficient in that they have not developed a written program with a chemical inventory listing or provided employee training as required by the Hazard Communication standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1530
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).  If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: (i) Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; (ii) Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and (iii) Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.  (a)  Facility - On or about June 3, 2016 and at times prior, employees were using hazardous chemicals including Aluminum Brightener II and the employer had not conducted a hazard assessment of the facility to determine the personal protective equipment (PPE) needed to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341522779.