Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HOMERO BUCIO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HOMERO BUCIO in THE BUNGALOWS AT MAYFAIR, NEW ALBANY, OH 43054 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341558617.

Watch Homero Bucio — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Homero Bucio is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HOMERO BUCIO
Site address
THE BUNGALOWS AT MAYFAIR
City
NEW ALBANY
State
OH
ZIP
43054
Mailing
1925 MINNESOTA AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a. In regards to citation 1, item 1, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, August 18, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:     a. On or before June 14, 2016, where employees were framing a two story house, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety program that covered the aspects of the work being conducted, thereby exposing employees to fall, struck-by, and other hazards.        b. In regards to citation 1, item 2, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 26, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:     a. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was operating an air actuated nail gun, the employees eyes were not protected from injury, exposing the employee to a struck-by hazards.        c. In regards to citation 1, item 5, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 26, 2016.  The violation read as follows:      29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities six feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:     a. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was installing roof sheeting on the north side of the house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a nine foot, ten inch fall hazard.     b. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was working on the interior of the second story, a wall opening was not guarded, thereby exposing the employee to a 12 foot fall hazard.        c. In regards to citation 1, item 6, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, July 26, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step:     a. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was framing the roof gable, the employee was working from the top of the stepladder, thereby being exposed to an eight foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   a. In regards to citation 1, item 3, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, July 26, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied.     a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the forklift was moved while the employee was in the elevated platform, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard:     b. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the platform was not secured to the forks, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard.     b. In regards to citation 1, item 4, issued on July 14, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, July 26, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components shall be inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:     a. On or before June 14, 2016, where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the platform was damaged and an inspection for visible defects by a competent person had not been completed, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before June 14, 2016 where employees were framing a two story house, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a safety program that covered the aspects of the work being conducted, thereby exposing employees to fall, struck-by, and other hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was operating an air actuated nail gun, the employees eyes were not protected from injury, thereby being exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts shall not be used to support scaffold platforms unless the entire platform is attached to the fork and the fork-lift is not moved horizontally while the platform is occupied.  a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the forklift was moved while the employee was in the elevated platform, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard.  b. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the platform was not secured to the forks, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components shall be inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.  a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was working from an elevated platform that was supported with a rough terrain forklift, the platform was damaged and an inspection for visible defects by a competent person had not been completed, thereby exposing the employee to a 16 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was installing roof sheeting on the north side of the house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 9 foot, 10 inch fall hazard.  b.  On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was working on the interior of the second story, a wall opening was not guarded, thereby exposing the employee to a 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder shall not be used as a step.   a. On or before June 14, 2016 where an employee was framing the roof gable, the employee was working from the top of the stepladder, thereby being exposed to an 8 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View HOMERO BUCIO's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341558617.