Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JW TRANSPORT, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of JW TRANSPORT, INC. in 2437 DURHAM ROAD, BRISTOL, PA 19007 (NAICS 811118). OSHA activity number 341606838.

Watch JW Transport, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JW Transport, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JW TRANSPORT, INC.
Site address
2437 DURHAM ROAD
City
BRISTOL
State
PA
ZIP
19007
Mailing
2437 DURHAM ROAD, BRISTOL, PA 19007
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811118
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $9442.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a) 2437 Durham Rd, Bristol - on or about July 7, 2016, the employer did not ensure each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate forklifts safely by means of successfully completing the specified training and evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9442
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  a) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, the employees operated a Hyster powered industrial truck, but the employer did not ensure that a nameplate was in place.  b) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, the employees operated a Clark powered industrial truck, but the employer did not ensure the nameplate was maintained in a legible condition.  c) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, the employees operated a TCM FCG 25 powered industrial truck, but the employer did not ensure the nameplate was maintained in a legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    a) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, a Mitsubishi 35 forklift used for maintenance operations had a broken propane tank locator pin, but was not removed from service by the employer.    b) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, a Hyster forklift used for maintenance operations had a broken propane tank locator pin and a broken speedometer gauge, but was not removed from service by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2672

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12471.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck(s).    a) Back Lot, 2437 Durham Rd. - on or about July 7, 2016, employees were working under elevated loads suspended by the forks of powered industrial trucks, resulting in struck-by and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1604.00 · Current $802.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Throughout Facility - on or about July 8, 2016, employees performed maintenance operations exposed to hazardous chemicals such as oils and lubricants, but the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $802
  • — Z (S) $1604

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  a) Throughout Facility - on or about July 8, 2016, employees performed maintenance operations exposed to hazardous chemicals such as oils and lubricants, but the employer did not have safety data sheets in the workplace for each hazardous chemical used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Throughout Facility - on or about July 8, 2016, employees performed maintenance operations exposed to hazardous chemicals such as oils and lubricants, but the employer did not provide information and training to the employees on hazardous chemicals used in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341606838.