Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART in 415 COUCH DRIVE, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102 (NAICS 712110). OSHA activity number 341617876.

Watch Oklahoma City Museum OF ART — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Oklahoma City Museum OF ART is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
415 COUCH DRIVE
City
OKLAHOMA CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73102
Mailing
415 COUCH DRIVE, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
712110
Employees
114
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5451.00 · Current $3271.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:  Wood shop:  On or about July 12, 2016, and times prior to, employees used the wood shop to produce and partially assemble wooden exhibit walls.  Powered saws generated saw dust accumulating on the floor and elevated horizontal surfaces, stain soaked cloth rags were not safely disposed, and various wooden objects and other items were blocking the work area floors.  This exposed the employees to the hazards of fire, and trips and slips.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3270.6
  • — Z (S) $5451

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4089.00 · Current $2453.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  Wood shop:  On or about July 12, 2016, and times prior to, employees fabricating exhibit display walls used pneumatic tools supplied by a portable air compressor.  The air compressor attachment cord was missing its grounding pin exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2453.4
  • — Z (S) $4089

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4089.00 · Current $2453.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Museum:  On or about July 12, 2016, and times prior to, employees engaged in the fabrication, installation, and cleaning of exhibit displays used materials as: paint, combustible stain, medium density fiberboard, and cleaning liquids.  The employees had not been trained on the hazards of the materials.  This exposed the employees to the hazards of the materials as fire, skin contact, and inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2453.4
  • — Z (S) $4089

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  Museum:  On or about July 12, 2016, and time prior to, employees engaged in the installation of exhibits that required the use of personnel protective equipment.  The required assessment and its resulting certification were not conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):     Museum:  On or about July 13, 2016, and times prior to, an employee engaged in the installation of exhibits drove a forklift.  The employee had received only on the job training on forklift operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Museum:  On or about July 13, 2016, and times prior to, an employee engaged in the installation of exhibits operated a forklift.  The employee had not been re-evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341617876.