Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

O FALLON, IL —

OSHA Inspection: KEITH POETTKER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KEITH POETTKER in NEW CONSTRUCITON NEXT TO 513 STILL HOLLOW RD, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341621894.

Watch Keith Poettker — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Keith Poettker is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
KEITH POETTKER
Site address
NEW CONSTRUCITON NEXT TO 513 STILL HOLLOW RD
City
O FALLON
State
IL
ZIP
62269
Mailing
380 S GERMANTOWN RD, BREESE, IL 62230

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

Citations

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Head protective equipment was not used when workers were exposed to struck-by hazards when handing material to workers on an upper level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:  The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately twenty (20) feet off the roof eve when they were installing framing and roofing sheeting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)

More inspections in IL

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341621894.