Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOYNUS STAFFING, CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOYNUS STAFFING, CORP. in 1500 CR 177, CUSSETA, AL 36852 (NAICS 561320). OSHA activity number 341657070.

Watch Joynus Staffing, Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Joynus Staffing, Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1500 CR 177
City
CUSSETA
State
AL
ZIP
36852
Mailing
2204 GATEWAY DRIVE UNIT B, OPELIKA, AL 36801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561320
Employees
600
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12471.00 · Current $8750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:   a)  ADA Dash Subline - A06-1/A06-2;  On or about June 18, 2016 and at times prior thereto, where procedures had not been developed, documented, and or utilized for the control of potential hazardous energy, Employee #2 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that the employee was required to enter a robotic cell where there were energized robots and other jigs and fixtures to replace a welding tip.  b)  ADA Dash Main Line - A900;  On or about June 18, 2016 and at times prior thereto, where procedures had not been developed, documented, and or utilized for the control of potential hazardous energy, Employee #9 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that the employee was required to enter a robotic cell where there were energized robots and other jigs and fixtures to replace a welding tip.  c)  JFA Quarter Line L/H - A06/A101/A05;  On or about June 17, 2016 and at times prior thereto, where procedures had not been developed, documented, and or utilized for the control of potential hazardous energy, Employee #28 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that the employee was required to enter a robotic cell where there were energized robots and other jigs and fixtures to replace a welding tip.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8750
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12471.00 · Current $8750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:   a)  ADA Dash Subline - A06-1/A06-2;  On or about June 18, 2016 and at times prior thereto, Employee #2 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that the employee was required to enter the robotic cell with energized robots and other jig and fixtures to replace a welding tip on a robot. The employee was unable to lock out the robotic cell because the employer had not provided or ensured the employee had a lock.  b)  ADA Dash Main Line - A900;  On or about June 18, 2016 and at times prior thereto, Employee #9 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that the employee was required to enter the robotic cell with energized robots and other jig and fixtures to replace a welding tip on a robot. The employee was unable to lock out the robotic cell because the employer had not provided or ensured the employee had a lock.  c)  JFA Quarter Line L/H - A06/A101/A05;  On or about June 17, 2016 and at times prior thereto, Employee #28 was exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and crush hazards in that employee was required to enter the robotic cell with energized robots and other jig and fixtures to replace a welding tip on a robot. The employee was unable to lock out the robotic cell because the employer had not provided or ensured the employee had a lock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8750
  • — Z (S) $12471

AEROTEK

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341657070.