OSHA Inspection: WAYNE GIBSON DBA A PRO CONSTRUCTION

Issued

2016-10-24 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $300.00 · Current $300.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 9/14/2016 with an abatement date of 9/20/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.

Issued

2016-10-24 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-28 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $300.00 · Current $300.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 2a, issued on 9/14/2016 with an abatement date of  9/20/2016, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 2b, issued on 9/14/2016 with an abatement date of 9/20/2016, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  c)  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 9/14/2016 with an abatement date of 9/20/2016, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  d)  For Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 9/14/2016 with an abatement date of 9/20/2016, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.

Issued

2016-09-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-09-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2138.00 · Current $2138.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    The employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.

Issued

2016-09-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-09-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  The employer did not ensure that circuits were de-energized or insulated when employees working to remove and install asphalt roofing shingles in close proximity to a 120/208v triplex service drop.

Issued

2016-09-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-09-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit.  The employer did not ensure that the electrical lines from the service drop were located so that employees working to remove and install asphalt shingles on the roof of a residential building would not come in contact with electrical power circuit from a 120/208v triplex service drop.

Issued

2016-09-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-09-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately eleven (11) feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof shingles.

Issued

2016-09-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-09-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access:    The employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing.  Workers performing residential construction were exposed to falling approximately eleven (11) feet while using an extension ladder to ascend/descend from the roof to the ground.