Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KCOM ENVIRONMENTAL

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of KCOM ENVIRONMENTAL in 168 N. MICHIGAN, CHICAGO, IL 60601 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 341705366.

Watch Kcom Environmental — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kcom Environmental is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KCOM ENVIRONMENTAL
Site address
168 N. MICHIGAN
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60601
Mailing
1884 E. FABYAN PARKWAY, BATAVIA, IL 60510
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3742.00 · Current $2245.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 μg/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):      a.  On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations on walls that were coated with lead based paint.  The employer did not collect personal samples to determine employee(s) exposure to lead, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2245.2
  • — Z (S) $3742

1926.62 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level:    a.  On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations on walls coated with lead based paint.  The employer did not collect personal samples to determine employee(s) exposure to lead, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3742.00 · Current $2245.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g):      a.  On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations of walls coated with lead based paint and the employer did not assure appropriate protective work clothing was used, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2245.2
  • — Z (S) $3742

1926.62 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1): Where employees were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of respirators; where employees were exposed to lead compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation (e.g. lead arsenate, lead azide); and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), the employer did not ensure that each employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments:        a.  On or about, August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations on walls coated with lead paint. The employer did not provide, at no cost, employees with protective clothing, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3742.00 · Current $2245.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2):    a. On or about August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations of walls coated with lead based paint and the employer did not provide change areas, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2245.2
  • — Z (S) $3742

1926.62 I02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators:    a.  On or about, August 17, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were conducting manual demolition operations on walls coated with lead based paint.  Employees were not provided with clean change areas, thereby exposing employees to lead hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341705366.