Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES - ST. MICHAEL'S LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES - ST. MICHAEL'S LLC in 111 CENTRAL AVENUE, NEWARK, NJ 07102 (NAICS 622310). OSHA activity number 341714038.

Watch Prime Healthcare Services - ST. Michael'S LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Prime Healthcare Services - ST. Michael'S LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
111 CENTRAL AVENUE
City
NEWARK
State
NJ
ZIP
07102
Mailing
111 CENTRAL AVENUE, NEWARK, NJ 07102
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622310
Employees
1415
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1016.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:    a) 111 Central Ave., Newark, NJ    The employer did not provide abatement certification for inspection number 1171403 as indicated below:        1.  Citation 1 Item 2 pertaining to 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i) which was due on 09/15/2017.      2.  Citation 1 Item 3a pertaining to 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) which was due on 09/15/2017.      3.  Citation 1 Item 3b pertaining to 29 CFR 1910.1200(h) which was due on 09/15/2017.      4.  Stipulated Settlement agreement required a copy of the written asbestos survey along with documentation of employee asbestos awareness training which was due on 09/15/2017.    Employer received citations on 01/26/2017.  Violation occurred on or about 07/27/2016
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1016

1910.1001 J03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1415 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9054.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3)(i): Building and facility owner(s) did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of asbestos containing material (ACM) and/or presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) at the work site and did not exercise due diligence in complying with these requirements to inform employer(s) and employee(s) about the presence and location of ACM and PACM:  a) Annex building, Building B, Building C, Building D  The employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) found in building materials, including but not limited to, thermal system insulation and flooring for Plant Operations and housekeeping employees who work throughout the Medical Center.    Condition observed on or about 7/27/16
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.1001 J05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1415 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9054.00 · Current $9054.00
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i): The employer did not affix signs or labels so that employees would be notified of what materials contain ACM and/or PACM to materials that were previously identified to be ACM and/or PACM:      a) Annex building, Building B, Building C, Building D    The employer did not label asbestos containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) found in building components, including but not limited to, thermal system insulation and flooring for Plant Operations and housekeeping employees who work in sections of the Medical Center built prior to 1980.      Condition observed on or about 7/27/16
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9054
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9054.00 · Current $9054.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Infusion Center  The employer did not implement an effective hazard communication program, in that employees exposed to chemotherapy drugs, including but not limited to, Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, Nivolumab and Gemzar, during administration and handling of contaminated linens and waste were not provided with training on their specific health effects.  Condition was observed on or about 7/27/2016
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9054
  • — C (S) $9054
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.1200 H

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (h)(2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced:    a) Infusion Center  The employer did not provide effective information and training, including specific health hazards and appropriate work practices for all employees exposed to chemotherapy drugs , including but not limited to, Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, Nivolumab and Gemzar, during administration to patients and handling of contaminated linens and waste.  Condition was observed on or about 7/27/2016
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341714038.